continued
from page 7
The use of Web sites to provide information
and plans to clients while a project
is in progress can lead to later disputes
about design changes or even the use of preliminary design information.
To avoid such disputes, firms need
to establish ground rules with clients
about which plans constitute the final, sealed versions.
Insurance Coverage Implications
As the use of technology such as the
Internet, email, design software,
and computer networks transforms the
architectural and engineering professions,
those firms need to make sure their
risk management programs reflect the
changes. As firms review their loss
control and prevention efforts, they
need to recognize that their new risks
may not be fully addressed by their
traditional insurance program. Firms
also need to document the best-practice
procedures they have instituted to
cover their technology risks and communicate
those practices to their underwriters.
In the insurance industry, the explosion
of digital technology over the last
decade has necessitated the development
of new products to address the emerging
coverage needs of companies in the
technology sphere. Many new products
have been developed since the late
1990s in response to the rapid spread
of Internet-based business and communications.
Today, insurers offer coverage for
risks such as the theft of confidential
data, loss or corruption of data caused
by hackers or malicious code, and
lost income when a network attack cripples
or shuts down a company’s Web
site. Insurers also offer liability
coverage for the release of confidential
information, retransmission of a computer virus
due to inadequate network security,
intellectual property disputes, and
even costs to restore public confidence
after a cyberattack.
While insurers have developed a wealth
of expertise in new technology risks,
businesses in other industries may
not receive the benefit of that knowledge.
The insurance industry often operates
in separate niches: some insurers
are experts in new technology and
others in architecture and engineering.
Insurers with expertise in traditional
architecture and engineering liabilities
may struggle with the new risks faced
by large multi-disciplined firms.
The adoption of new technology by
design firms has led to hybrid exposures
that may go unaddressed in a firm’s
insurance program. Technology coverage forms are typically used for companies
in the technology space, while architectural
and engineering firms typically will
be covered under an A&E form.
A&E forms, however, may not adequately
address information technology exposures,
such as copyright infringement or
multimedia liability arising from
the posting of information on the
Internet.
Many policy forms explicitly define
A&E services as professional services
including work such as architectural
services, electrical engineering,
interior design, master planning, and other
traditional areas. Those definitions
may fail to reference the technology
services rendered in support of the
architectural and engineering services.
The definition of professional services
is a crucial issue for larger firms
that are involved not only in traditional
architectural and engineering services
but also with the operation and maintenance
of systems, programming of manufacturing
systems, and process engineering.
Those additional services may be a
key portion of a multi-disciplined
firm’s business, complementing
their traditional services. The traditional
definition of professional services
for an A&E firm, however, may not cover those new areas
of business. Such risks may need to
be addressed through adding endorsements
or by manuscripting policies so that
the professional services definition
explicitly mentions the new services.
CFOs and risk managers need to ensure
that their insurance programs are
up-to-date in addressing these new
exposures. Some of the newer editions
of A&E policy forms now explicitly
address issues such as software development
under a product exclusion. Coverage
in that area may be provided via a
carve-back for software design, or
the form could be specifically modified
to fit the client’s needs. While
software copyright infringement is
a huge issue in business today, it
is not provided as a standard coverage
grant under A&E or technology
policies. Clients may need to request
such coverage separately and have
it underwritten via a supplemental
application.
Conclusion
In the current insurance market, there
is adequate capacity in the traditional
A&E markets as well as in the
technology market. However, only a
finite number of insurers can do both
well — i.e., bring adequate
expertise to address the new technology
exposures for A&E firms and manuscript
and tailor policies by providing the
right endorsements.
To make sure that they are fully
serving their clients’ needs,
insurers must recognize the dangers
in isolating their areas of expertise
into separate niches. A lack of communication between underwriters
with varying areas of expertise can
leave a modern A&E firm uncovered
for new technology risks.
Architects design the buildings where
we live and work assisted by engineers
who design the integral structural
and other related components. Engineers
also design the infrastructure of
the modern world and the equipment
that runs the global economy. Their
adoption of digital technology promises
to bring even more changes to the
physical landscape of modern life.
In the world of technology, the insurance
industry has played a crucial role
by providing risk transfer opportunities
to support the digital revolution.
In many cases, they have not been
as proactive in bringing that experience
to bear in the A&E fields. Insurers,
however, can play that same supportive
role in working with architects and
engineers as they adopt new technology
to design bold, new projects.
By combining their talents and expertise
in traditional markets with their
skills in emerging technology risks,
insurers not only open new opportunities
for themselves, they serve their clients
better and help architects and engineers
build the modern world.
Endnotes>>
|